The Editors' Weekly
Official blog of Canada's national editorial association
The Editors' Weekly
Navigation
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • editors.ca
  • reviseurs.ca
You are here: Home › Karen Virag › GETTABLE GRAMMAR: Learning to like “like”
← DISPATCHES 2: What’s in an Internship?
Old Words →

GETTABLE GRAMMAR: Learning to like “like”

April 9, 2013 | Filed under: Karen Virag and tagged with: editing, editor, Edwin Batistella, Gettable Grammar, grammar, Grammar Gals, R.W. Burchfield, usage
Black-and-white portrait of R. W. Burchfield, author of New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, a distinguished-looking older man in a suit and tie with large, black-rimmed glasses, sitting in front of a bookshelf filled with books.

R. W. Burchfield

One often hears complaints about how some people litter their sentences with the word like—not as a noun, verb, preposition or conjunction, but as, like, an interjection. Like that. Now I know that Canadians like to blame Americans for all the world’s ills, but we can’t really lay this verbal tic at the feet of California Valley Girls, as some have done. As R.W. Burchfield tells us in the New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, like as an interjection (or as he calls it, a dialectical filler), is pretty old. He identifies the first written instance of it in the 1778 novel Evelina, by the English novelist Fanny Burney. And he also cites the use of like as interjection by such well-considered writers as Sir Walter Scott and de Quincy.

In the online language magazine Vocabula Review, Edwin Battistella, a professor of English and writing at Southern Oregon University, speaks up for like:

Grammarians have started to recognize a system to like. It can be used to indicate approximation. Reporting on a number of dollars, someone might say that “Gas is like $3.50 a gallon.” Maybe it’s a little more or a little less, but that is the ballpark figure. “She has like a thousand books” means the speaker is estimating rather than counting. Without the like, the sentences are misleading because the numbers are not intended to be definitive.

Colour portrait of Dr. Edwin Battistella, dressed in a shirt and sports jacket with arms open, likely delivering a lecture.

Edwin Battistella

This is all fine and good, but what about when the phrase be like is used as an equivalent of said? Everyone has heard conversations like, “So, I’m like, ‘I’m not going,’ and he’s like ‘Yes, you are,’ so I’m like, ‘No way,’ and he’s like ‘Yes way.’” The grammarian Bryan Garner calls this use of like a “low casualism” and notes that though it is ubiquitous among teenagers it is a sign of “arrested development” in adults. Ouch! I say this because I occasionally use like as described above, though not in such an egregiously  teenagerish way.

Maybe the problem is not the occasional such use of like but the overuse (which, let’s be fair, can happen with other words and phrases, such as right, you know, sort of and okay). In fact, I suspect that the chances of there being many people who ever have a like-free day is, as they might say in Old Blighty, not bloody likely.

Gettable Grammar is a monthly series of conjectures, opinions and postulates by Karen Virag.

Previous post: Things that dangle

Next post: Whom, don’t leave us! We hardly knew ye!

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Karen Virag

Karen Virag, a well-known writer and editor, passed away on Jan. 11, 2014. She was a longtime EAC member and half of CBC Radio's Grammar Gals.

← DISPATCHES 2: What’s in an Internship?
Old Words →

2 Responses to "GETTABLE GRAMMAR: Learning to like “like”"

  1. Anita Jenkins says:
    April 9, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    “Arrested development,” indeed. Who are these people? Slang and “casualism” is often banal and a sign of a limited vocabulary or not taking time to think, but humans are banal etc. Slang is also very rich and something most of us enjoy using. The language snobs will always be with us.

    Reply
  2. Debra Huron says:
    May 30, 2013 at 10:58 am

    The word that I find is being interjected into sentences by many thousands of English speakers these days is “so.”
    It shows up at the beginning of sentences. Is it a replacement for “um” or is it a verbal pebble tossed into the sentence to begin the rippling of words to follow?
    I find that academics, in particular, are using “so” to begin sentences.
    So, is it annoying?
    So, will it soon find its way into written English?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What we’re talking about

author-editor relationship authors book editors book publishing book reviews business of editing business practices communication copy editing editing editor editor's role editorial skills editorial work editors editors at work film freelance editors freelancing Gettable Grammar government editing grammar Inner Editor intern James Harbeck language language change linguistics Linguistics Frankly Paul Cipywnyk proofreading publishing Rosemary Shipton rédaction révision self-publishing style traduction translation usage Wasted Words Wilf Popoff word choice writers writing

Email subscriptions

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 622 other subscribers

Most recent posts

  • An Academic Rock Star’s Advice for Editors
  • Do you want to use a Germanic feature, or do you prefer using a Celtic one?
  • The Perils of Blabbing
  • Quick Topics: Books, Books, Books
  • Wasted Words: Salvaging a Thesis

Archives by month

By author

Follow Us Online

Facebook  Twitter  Flickr  RSS Feed

www.editors.ca

The Editors' Weekly is the blog of Editors Canada.

© 2018 The Editors' Weekly

Powered by One Designs