The Editors' Weekly
Official blog of Canada's national editorial association
The Editors' Weekly
Navigation
  • About the Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Articles en français
  • editors.ca
  • reviseurs.ca
You are here: Home › Christina Vasilevski › Usability Testing From an Editor’s Perspective
← Getting Paid a Living Wage: The Editor’s Constant Challenge
Editing: An Essentialist Craft? →

Usability Testing From an Editor’s Perspective

April 23, 2019 | Filed under: Christina Vasilevski and tagged with: Christina Vasilevski, design, editing, in-house editing, in-house editors, usability testing, user experience, UX, websites, writing

This post is part of a new series of case studies by and for in-house editors. The focus of this series is on the personal experiences and various roles of in-house editors. A post will appear on the Editors’ Weekly every other month. If you’re interested in writing a post for this series, please email the Member Services Committee. 

GUI design Smartphone App UI UX Improvement

aurielaki © 123RF.com

When you think of a website, you may think of paragraphs to read, images to peruse or empty boxes to type in. But what you may not think of is that for many sites, every aspect of user interaction, from the size of text boxes to the labels on buttons, has been analyzed to determine what makes them easier (or more engaging) to use. One method of analysis is usability testing.

What Is Usability Testing?

Usability testing is when designers ask users to complete a task on a website and take notes about what happens. The notes are then used to improve the site’s user experience (UX).

These sessions often involve one-way mirrors so that the user sits in one room and others monitor the user through the non-reflective side of the mirror. A UX professional asks the user questions about the task they’ve been asked to accomplish, such as:

  • If you wanted to review an order you made on this website, how would you start?
  • What do you think this page heading means?
  • When you read a paragraph of text, did it answer your questions?

The person leading the test encourages the user to explain their thoughts aloud.

How Editors Benefit From Taking Part in Usability Testing

Getting such real-time user feedback can be invaluable not only to designers, but also to writers and editors, especially if multiple users have the same questions or experience the same problems navigating a site.

For example, if a user has been asked to log into an online account to check a bill for a recent purchase, you may realize things like:

  • The key selling point that your employer or client wants to use in all their marketing needs to be rewritten.
  • You need to rewrite components of your company’s online bill because customers don’t understand that “HST” refers to taxes.
  • You’re using inconsistent terminology across the site, and customers don’t recognize that “offers exclusive to you” means the same thing as “personalized offers.”

These insights will be important when you write the next draft of copy for a specific page or series of pages. You can also use them to persuade your colleagues away from a specific design choice or course of action, because you have evidence that what they’re suggesting won’t work.

Where to Learn More About Usability Testing

Two well-known books about usability testing are Don’t Make Me Think and Rocket Surgery Made Easy by Steve Krug. You can also check out websites that discuss UX and user interface design, like A List Apart (www.alistapart.com), Smashing Magazine (www.smashingmagazine.com) and The Interaction Design Foundation (https://www.interaction-design.org/).

___

Previous post from the in-house editing series: Client Relationships for the In-house Editor.

The Editors’ Weekly is the official blog of Editors Canada. Contact us.

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Christina Vasilevski

Christina Vasilevski is a Certified Copy Editor. She works with Rogers Communications on digital content like mobile apps and website updates.

Visit my Website Follow me on Twitter
← Getting Paid a Living Wage: The Editor’s Constant Challenge
Editing: An Essentialist Craft? →

What we’re talking about

Aaron Dalton author-editor relationship authors book editors book publishing business practices communication communications copy editing editing editing tools editor editor's role editor advice editorial skills editors editors at work Editors Canada conference français freelance editors freelancing French grammar interview James Harbeck language linguistics Linguistics Frankly Marianne Grier networking plain language proofreading publishing Rosemary Shipton rédaction révision style traduction translation usage Wasted Words Wilf Popoff word choice writers writing

Email subscriptions

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,005 other subscribers

Most recent posts

  • An Interview with Jen Campbell, Editors Canada Conference Keynote Speaker
  • A New Editing Community Emerges: Neurodivergent Editors
  • An Interview with Lorina Stephens, Editors Canada Conference Keynote Speaker
  • Three Ways Long-term Clients Make Freelancing Less Stressful
  • What Does a Recipe Editor Do?

Archives by month

By author

Follow Us Online

Facebook  Twitter  Flickr  RSS Feed

www.editors.ca

The Editors' Weekly is the blog of Editors Canada.

Report an error or a typo

Email us at blog [at] editors.ca

© 2022 The Editors' Weekly

Powered by One Designs