The Editors' Weekly
Official blog of Canada's national editorial association
The Editors' Weekly
Navigation
  • About the Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Articles en français
  • editors.ca
  • reviseurs.ca
You are here: Home › Karen Virag › Revisiting Karen Virag: I Are Confused
← Happy Holidays and Year in Review
Yeet Citationality: Yippie-ki-yay! →

Revisiting Karen Virag: I Are Confused

January 8, 2019 | Filed under: Karen Virag and tagged with: Gettable Grammar, grammar, Karen Virag, usage
businessman with question marks

funwayillustration © 123RF.com

In memory of Karen Virag, who passed away on Jan. 11, 2014, we are pleased to republish one of her popular blog posts from February 2013.

I are confused, aren’t I?

Have you ever wondered why we say, “He is, isn’t he?” and “She is, isn’t she?” but we don’t say “I am, amn’t I?” (though you might say this if you lived in certain parts of Scotland and Ireland, where amn’t is still commonly heard).

According to Oxford University lexicographer Michael Quinion, in his wonderful website World Wide Words, amn’t actually has quite a long lineage, dating back as far back as the year 1600. He tells us, though, that amn’t was never as popular as the contraction an’t, which used to be used in place of are not and is not. To illustrate, Quinion cites none other than the brilliant Irish satirist Jonathan Swift, who in his 1710 work, Journal to Stella, penned the immortal line: “An’t you an impudent slut?”

At the time the letter a was often pronounced more like ay. Consequently, people began to spell an’t as ain’t, and it became a perfectly acceptable and commonly used word. But eventually those persnickety 18th-century prescriptivists got their hands on it — calling it nothing less than a “vulgar corruption!” — and condemned ain’t along with its little buddy an’t.

Quinion explains that “another pronunciation of an’t, in which the vowel was drawn out and somewhat drawled eventually led to the spelling pronunciation aren’t, with a silent r. This explains why ‘aren’t I’ exists, which is otherwise a puzzle, since there’s no obvious way that it could have been formed from ‘am I not.’ ”

Many grammarians dislike “aren’t I” because of the incongruity created when a first-person singular pronoun meets a plural verb. Despite this, “aren’t I” has become accepted in standard English. The alternative, of course, is the uncontracted phrase “am I not,” which the Oxford Guide calls “stuffy,” though the Guide claims that most Canadians use it in writing.

I ain’t too sure about that.

__

Previous post: Happy Holidays and Year in Review

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Karen Virag

Karen Virag, a well-known writer and editor, passed away on Jan. 11, 2014. She was a longtime EAC member and half of CBC Radio's Grammar Gals.

← Happy Holidays and Year in Review
Yeet Citationality: Yippie-ki-yay! →

One Response to "Revisiting Karen Virag: I Are Confused"

  1. Anita Jenkins says:
    January 8, 2019 at 9:02 am

    I am hoping there is another Karen Virag type out there somewhere who can regale us with more posts like this. We all need a laugh along with our learning. And a few off-colour remarks to spice things up.

    Big shoes to fill, but if you think you are qualified, please come forward.

Comments are closed.

What we’re talking about

Aaron Dalton author-editor relationship authors book editors book publishing communication copy editing editing editing tools editor editor's role editor advice editorial skills editors editors at work Editors Canada conference français freelance editing freelance editors freelancing French grammar interview James Harbeck language letter from the editor linguistics Linguistics Frankly Marianne Grier marketing networking plain language professional development proofreading publishing Rosemary Shipton révision style translation usage Wasted Words Wilf Popoff word choice writers writing

Email subscriptions

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,055 other subscribers

Most recent posts

  • Editing Indigenous Writing: A Nuanced Partnership
  • Encouraging Coworkers to See the Benefits of Editing
  • Meeting “In Real Life”: Conference 2023
  • The Editors’ Weekly en français
  • Editing for Authors on a Budget

Archives by month

By author

Follow Us Online

Facebook  Twitter  Flickr  RSS Feed

www.editors.ca

The Editors' Weekly is the blog of Editors Canada.

Report an error or a typo

Email us at blog [at] editors.ca

© 2023 The Editors' Weekly

Powered by One Designs