The Editors' Weekly
Official blog of Canada's national editorial association
The Editors' Weekly
Navigation
  • About the Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Articles en français
  • editors.ca
  • reviseurs.ca
You are here: Home › Rosemary Shipton › The Editor’s Letter
← Indigenous Voices: An Interview with Rhonda Kronyk
Zoom Time →

The Editor’s Letter

July 14, 2020 | Filed under: Rosemary Shipton and tagged with: client-editor relationship, communication, copy editing, Rosemary Shipton, structural editing, stylistic editing
Illustration of an open laptop with a sheet of paper coming from it (like an old typewriter). Laptop surrounded by a smartphone, notebook, crumpled up paper, a cup of coffee on a saucer, and a couple of pens.
Lukyanov Vladislav © 123RF.com

The editor’s letter — the first substantive communication you have with a client — is the most important task in any editorial project. It provides the opportunity to give your assessment, raise questions and establish a relationship. If this exchange is successful, the myriad other tasks should follow seamlessly.

In this scenario, you’ve been hired by a new client — a publisher, institution, department or author — to edit a text. When the manuscript (or a portion of it) arrives, read it through quickly. If you are the only editor working on it, you should be prepared to assess it from all three editorial points of view — structural, stylistic and copy editing. Once you have your points in order, it’s time to write the letter.

You know that the author or a group of writers has spent countless hours preparing the manuscript. Most of them want you to say that the manuscript is perfect in every way except for some minor fixes. But alas, that is never the way. Your list of points is likely long, involving issues of organization, presentation, infelicities of style and the three Cs of copy editing — clarity, correction and consistency. Before you can begin your detailed work, you’ll have to agree on some important decisions.

It’s always best to begin the letter on a positive note — on what you honestly like about the text. If you can’t find anything sincere to say, perhaps you’re not the right editor for the project. Once that paragraph is composed, move on to your list, beginning with such large issues as clarity of theme and focus, suitability of language for intended readers, length, pacing, characterization, context, gaps, repetition and whether the title and the headings work as they should.  

If your contract stipulates that you will be doing a substantive edit, you’ll simply alert the writer of the problems you’ll be addressing. But if your role is restricted to making suggestions, the outcome will depend on how well you convince the writer to follow your advice.  

Don’t get bogged down in your letter with detailed stylistic suggestions: mention only recurring issues such as word repetition or paragraphs that are too short or too long. You’ll solve all the other problems one by one as you edit. As for copy editing, if your client has provided a style guide, you’ll simply follow it. But if you are to set the style, you’d be wise to check some contentious points, such as capitalization, in this letter and agree on an acceptable system with your client.

The tone you establish in this initial communication is critical in gaining your client’s trust and confidence. Try to establish yourself as a valued partner in the project — the specialist in the presentation and publication of the text. If you come across as knowledgeable and with good judgment, your client will respect you.

If you seem co-operative and supportive, the client will respond in kind — and you will succeed not only on this project but on future ones too.

___

Previous post from Rosemary Shipton: To Retire — or Not?

The Editors’ Weekly is the official blog of Editors Canada. Contact us.

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet
Rosemary Shipton

Written by Rosemary Shipton

Rosemary Shipton edits trade, scholarly and art books as well as commission of inquiry reports. From 1990 to 2007 she was the founding academic coordinator of the publishing program at Ryerson University in Toronto.

← Indigenous Voices: An Interview with Rhonda Kronyk
Zoom Time →

5 Responses to "The Editor’s Letter"

  1. Anita Jenkins says:
    July 14, 2020 at 8:26 am

    Ah, advice from Rosemary Shipton. With a link to an excellent article on establishing the tone. What a gift.

  2. Mary Rykov says:
    July 14, 2020 at 2:54 pm

    Rosemary Shipton, a paragon of grace and tact, raises an excellent point about the importance of the editor’s letter being foundational to the editor-client relationship. Linking to Nina Munteanu’s piece about tone is equally apt.

    I’m honoured to be a sister-in-press with Nina. Her novel, A Diary in the Age of Water, and my poetry collection, some conditions apply, launched together last month from Inanna Publications.

    Shameless promotion here: both books sell at a 30% discount with the “summer20” coupon code at https://www.inanna.ca/.

  3. Frances Peck says:
    July 16, 2020 at 11:58 am

    When looking for elements to praise in a manuscript that’s especially rough, you can nearly always commend the time, effort and subject-matter expertise the author has invested in the work. I’ve worked with many authors whose writing skills are weak but whose knowledge is tremendous. It’s important that they know that YOU know how much they’ve toiled over a piece that may, in the end, need dramatic editorial intervention.

    1. Rosemary Shipton says:
      July 16, 2020 at 1:16 pm

      An excellent point, Frances. The comment you suggest would show that you understand what the author is trying to do and appreciate the effort involved. It should lead on to a fruitful cooperation between the writer and the editor.

  4. Carla DeSantis says:
    July 21, 2020 at 8:29 am

    Thank you for highlighting the need to set a positive tone from the beginning. The rapport established between client and editor is crucial.

Comments are closed.

What we’re talking about

Aaron Dalton author-editor relationship authors book editors book publishing communication copy editing editing editing tools editor editor's role editor advice editorial skills editors editors at work Editors Canada conference français freelance editing freelance editors freelancing French grammar interview James Harbeck language letter from the editor linguistics Linguistics Frankly Marianne Grier marketing networking plain language professional development proofreading publishing Rosemary Shipton révision style usage volunteers Wasted Words Wilf Popoff word choice writers writing

Email subscriptions

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,084 other subscribers

Most recent posts

  • La composition du CAN : directrice du marketing et des communications et directrice du recrutement et de la fidélisation des membres
  • The NEC in Detail: Director of Marketing and Communications and Director of Member Recruitment and Retention
  • Book Recommendations for Editors
  • Editing in Times of Chaos and Loss
  • Seasoned Editors’ Tips for Newcomers

Archives by month

By author

Follow Us Online

Facebook  Twitter  Flickr  RSS Feed

www.editors.ca

The Editors' Weekly is the blog of Editors Canada.

Report an error or a typo

Email us at blog [at] editors.ca

© 2023 The Editors' Weekly

Powered by One Designs