The Editors' Weekly
Official blog of Canada's national editorial association
The Editors' Weekly
Navigation
  • About the Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Articles en français
  • editors.ca
  • reviseurs.ca
You are here: Home › Virginia Durksen › The Inner Editor: The Voice and Its Vices
← Editing Niches: Back to School With Thesis Editing
Ours Is Not to Reason Why — Or Is It? →

The Inner Editor: The Voice and Its Vices

September 27, 2016 | Filed under: Virginia Durksen and tagged with: editing voice, Inner Editor, style, Virginia Durksen, writer's voice
Copyright: only4denn / 123RF Stock Photo

Copyright: only4denn / 123RF Stock Photo

When editors talk about a writer’s “voice,” we usually mean something like a writer’s style or tone or stance. Even if you’ve never given much thought to this term, you’ll know what “voice” means if you can recall a moment when you, as a child, first heard “Don’t use that voice with me, young lady.” It’s a command I remember well, delivered in its own imperial voice.

A standard piece of writing advice is something like this: Write as you would speak. As I understand this advice, it’s a reminder that we sound most authentic when we are not trying to write like someone else or say something we don’t quite believe. It also assumes we are not trying to match our [insert relevant interlocutor here: parent’s, partner’s, boss’s] tone of voice.

In the everyday tasks of workplace writing, we all have a voice and several variations of it, depending on the circumstances and our role in them. Problems with this highly individual voice can arise when we’re trying to get something done quickly — making an urgent request for action, for example, or composing a heartfelt reply to a post on Facebook. The urgency or emotion we feel when sending the message can become distorted at the other end, where the reader receives it. Our urgency easily translates into bossiness, and the use of personal pronouns can quickly shift from “we are in this together” to “it’s my way versus your way.”

Writing the way you would speak is fine if you’re a well-informed speaker and not caught up in the urgencies of the moment or the threat of contradiction. If you have time, in other words, to pause, collect your thoughts, consider your audience, write a draft, edit the draft, take out the bits that, at second glance, convey a condescending tone, and then read it over before you post it on Facebook. That kind of speaker.

As an editor, I am happiest working with writers who have developed a voice that suits their workplace role and who leave behind the voice they once used to dazzle professors. Or flatter bosses. Or imitate the adults at the big table.

To detect the false notes, sometimes a sound check is helpful. Imagine the piece being read aloud by someone whose voice you know well. This is a step beyond reading your own writing aloud, in your own voice. Depending on the context, one might borrow the vocal stylings of Trump, Trudeau and Clinton (Bill, for parallel gender). The underlying tonal variations to listen for might be something like bombast, treacle and charm. (I leave you, dear reader, to decide which description belongs to which speaker.)

Or, test the piece with specific listeners in mind, in effect creating your own version of a story where three people attend your reading in a pub: a professor, a priest and a salesman, for example.

How do you recognize and adjust voice in your own writing or the writing of others?

~~~

Previous post from Virginia Durksen: The Inner Editor: Friends, Readers, Editors.

The Editors’ Weekly is the official blog of Editors Canada. Contact us.

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Virginia Durksen

Virginia Durksen teaches writing and editing workshops through her company, Visible Ink: Writing @ Work. She practices gentle editing for a small group of favourite clients. She is also a lightly published poet.

Visit my Website Follow me on Twitter
← Editing Niches: Back to School With Thesis Editing
Ours Is Not to Reason Why — Or Is It? →

3 Responses to "The Inner Editor: The Voice and Its Vices"

  1. Anita Jenkins says:
    September 27, 2016 at 7:20 am

    “Like.” Yes, wasn’t that speech by Bill Clinton in support of “Hil” just absolutely charming?

    1. Virginia Durksen says:
      September 27, 2016 at 11:32 am

      Charm is what he does best, I think. It’s completely natural, not faked or forced.

  2. Frances Peck says:
    September 29, 2016 at 3:19 pm

    A wonderful post, Virginia. With all the broad public channels open to us nowadays (like Facebook, like this blog), it’s crucial that we remember how easily our bombast, criticism or other emotional writing might not only mislead but might inflame, offend or alienate certain readers. Conveying arguments and beliefs in measured tones is one of the most difficult kinds of writing there is. I love your suggestion of imagining a professor, a priest and a salesperson all listening to your words before going public with them. That’s tangible advice I’ll share far and wide. Thank you!

Comments are closed.

What we’re talking about

Aaron Dalton author-editor relationship authors book editors book publishing communication copy editing editing editing tools editor editor's role editor advice editorial skills editors editors at work Editors Canada conference français freelance editing freelance editors freelancing French grammar interview James Harbeck language letter from the editor linguistics Linguistics Frankly Marianne Grier marketing networking plain language professional development proofreading publishing Rosemary Shipton révision style usage volunteers Wasted Words Wilf Popoff word choice writers writing

Email subscriptions

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,084 other subscribers

Most recent posts

  • La composition du CAN : directrice du marketing et des communications et directrice du recrutement et de la fidélisation des membres
  • The NEC in Detail: Director of Marketing and Communications and Director of Member Recruitment and Retention
  • Book Recommendations for Editors
  • Editing in Times of Chaos and Loss
  • Seasoned Editors’ Tips for Newcomers

Archives by month

By author

Follow Us Online

Facebook  Twitter  Flickr  RSS Feed

www.editors.ca

The Editors' Weekly is the blog of Editors Canada.

Report an error or a typo

Email us at blog [at] editors.ca

© 2023 The Editors' Weekly

Powered by One Designs